NEW in Florida Ethics
. . .
|
A trial court did not err in awarding
attorney’s fees against a former wife under F.S. 61.16 without an express
finding of her ability to pay .
. . (more)
5/15/12 |
|
The Second
DCA reverses a judgment for attorney’s fees because there was no hearing on the
fee motion . . . (more)
5/15/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Third DCA discusses the need for
candor to the court in ex parte proceedings . . .
(more)
5/11/12 |
|
The Fourth DCA clarifies the legal
standard applicable to postconviction ineffective assistance claims related to a
defendant’s competency. . . (more)
5/11/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Florida Supreme Court’s Commission on
Professionalism looks into adopting formal procedures to enforce
professionalism standards . . .
(more)
5/9/12 |
|
The First DCA commends the
professionalism of criminal prosecutors who conceded error regarding a
Faretta issue . . . (more)
5/9/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Fifth DCA criticizes the
professionalism of a lawyer who “strongly disagreed” with the trial court’s
order in a divorce case. . . (more)
5/7/12 |
|
A proposal for settlement made by 2 defendants
was not invalid for failure to apportion the offer between defendants . .
. (more)
5/7/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
In reversing application of a multiplier
in a FCCPA case, the Second DCA searches for a solution to problems generated by
fee statutes in cases where a client’s damages are small . . . (more)
5/3/12 |
|
An offer of judgment was an
undifferentiated joint proposal that could not serve as the basis for a fee
award against the party who rejected it .
. . (more)
5/3/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Code of Judicial Conduct does not require a
judge to report possible criminal activity that the judge learns of during
judicial proceedings .
. . (more)
4/30/12 |
|
The Fourth DCA affirms attorneys’ fee judgments,
agreeing that the parties waived the failure to plead entitlement to fees .
. . (more)
4/30/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
State law providing for prevailing party
attorney’s fees must yield to the federal government’s sovereign immunity
claim . .
. (more)
4/22/12 |
|
The Supreme Court amends some rules
as proposed by the Bar but rejects others, including lien
resolution services and trust account signatory rules . . . (more)
4/12/12 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Supreme Court invites comments on the Bar's
recently-filed changes to the
proposed
advertising rules that have been pending since July
2011. . . (more)
3/22/12 |
|
Several of Florida's lawyer advertising rules are held unconstitutional by a
federal court .
. . (more)
10/5/11 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Florida Bar asks the Supreme Court to
approve
major changes to the
lawyer advertising rules . . . (more)
7/6/11 |
|
The Florida Supreme Court changes the effective
date for the website rule amendments to July 1, 2010, but stays
implementation .
. . (more)
26/8/10, 6/10/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|